Ahead of the FOMC: Can the Fed Justify a Cut Under Its Dual Mandate?

Download here

Executive Summary

  • Markets expect the start of an easing cycle at this week’s FOMC meeting. The policy challenge is explaining why policy easing is consistent with the Fed’s dual mandate—maximum employment and price stability—when inflation has not yet returned to the 2% PCE goal.
  • Inflation progress has become more uneven. Shelter components are decelerating, but non-shelter core measures have firmed modestly since mid-last year, complicating the case for cuts framed purely as relief from “sticky shelter readings.”
  • The labor market has cooled from 2021–2023 peaks but remains resilient: unemployment (U-3) is still low by historical standards, broader under-employment (U-6) is contained, and reduced churn (lower quits and hires) may suggest normalization rather than deterioration. Recent BLS revisions show job growth over the past two years was slower than initially reported, yet hiring over the past year is still above Fed economists’ estimated breakeven levels.
  • Market signals are mixed. A higher long end of the Treasury curve suggests lingering inflation risk or rebuilding term premium, while a re-steepened 2s/10s curve tempers hard-landing fears.
  • Key risk now in focus: a form of stagflation-lite—slower growth alongside sticky non-shelter inflation. The Fed must thread the needle: acknowledge disinflation fatigue without loosening financial conditions so much that inflation re-accelerates.

What Is the Fed’s Dual Mandate

“The Federal Reserve works to promote a strong U.S. economy. Specifically, Congress has assigned the Fed to conduct the nation’s monetary policy to support the goals of maximum employment and stable prices. Those two goals are often referred to as the Fed’s ‘dual mandate.” i

Policy Backdrop: The Fed’s Mandate and the Target

When the Fed meets this week, markets expect the beginning of a rate cut cycle. The challenge for the Fed, however, will be how to articulate a meaningful policy shift in the context of their dual mandate. In our view, it will be a difficult case to make, and a cut is likely to be framed as managing the balance of risks with greater weight assigned to potential labor market deterioration.

By mandate, the Fed has two objectives in conducting monetary policy: promote maximum employment and price stability. The latter is more clearly defined as a long-term inflation rate of 2 percent as measured by the annual change in PCE.ii

The problem is that inflation has not reached the Fed’s target. In fact, inflation remains higher than the beginning of three of the four previous interest rate hiking cycles.

If the Fed does cut, one of the challenges in abandoning the 2 percent inflation target is that this is no longer a story about sticky, lagging shelter inflation (see below). Core CPI minus housing and Core PCE minus housing show that non-shelter components have moved up a bit since the middle of last year. Meanwhile, shelter components have decelerated.

Core CPI ex Shelter Increasing in Recent Monthsiii

Core PCE Readings In-line with Core ex Shelteriv

If inflation is no longer the primary target, what does labor market data tell us?

From an unemployment perspective, the standard benchmark, the U-3 level, remains near historically low levels below 5 percent, signaling limited slack. Under-employment (the U-6 measure), which includes unemployed people having difficulty finding a job and involuntary part time workers, also appears contained and near historic lows (see below).

Low Rates for U-3 Unemployment and U-6 (Includes Marginally Attached and Involuntarily Part-Time Workers)v

Turning to hiring data from the BLS JOLTS repot (“Job Opening and Labor Turnover Survey”), we see less labor market churn than in recent years (see below). Fewer people are voluntarily leaving their jobs on a monthly basis, and as fewer jobs are required to backfill their departures, we are seeing both the hiring and quits rates decline—arguably that is a measure of labor market stability.

The Churn of “Job Switchers” Has Subsided as Hiring Has Slowedvi

Recent BLS revisions have come into focus as well. The first visual below is employment growth before the September 2024 jumbo-sized downward revision by the BLS. The second includes both the 2024 and 2025 BLS revisions, which shows that job growth after 2020 was less hot than initially believed, and the past year has seen relatively underwhelming job growth figures.

Nonfarm Employment Growth Prior to September 2024 Revisionsvii

Nonfarm Employment Growth After 2024 and 2025 Revisionsviii

However, it is important to note that underwhelming does not mean that the labor market is losing ground. According to St. Louis Fed economists who analyze the breakeven rate, expected lower immigration this year may have lowered the breakeven rate to somewhere between 32,000 and 82,000 jobs per month on average.ix Over the past year, we have seen 122,000 jobs per month.

So, what does the market tell us right now? Rising yields on the long end of the curve might suggest a lack of confidence that inflation is under control. At the same time, the 2- and 10-year spread has been in positive territory for over a year following a two-year inversion, which is rare re-steepening without seeing a recession.

It appears that stagflation has emerged as the front running concern that may require the Fed to adjust its policy stance. And since that is outside of the Fed’s dual mandate, we will see how they thread the needle on this this week—both with respect to providing an understanding of a policy framework going forward as well as providing assurance to markets.

i Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. FAQs: What economic goals does the Federal Reserve seek to achieve through its monetary policy? As of September 12, 2025. Accessed at: https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/what-economic-goals-does-federal-reserve-seek-to-achieve-through-monetary-policy.htm
ii Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. FAQs: What economic goals does the Federal Reserve seek to achieve through its monetary policy? As of September 12, 2025. Accessed at: https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/what-economic-goals-does-federal-reserve-seek-to-achieve-through-monetary-policy.htm
iii Bloomberg as of September 11, 2025.
iv Bloomberg as of September 11, 2025.
v Bloomberg as of September 11, 2025.
vi Bloomberg as of September 11, 2025.
vii Bloomberg as of September 4, 2024.
viii Bloomberg as of September 11, 2025.
ix Bick, Alexander. August 28, 2025. Lower Immigration Projections Mean Lower Breakeven Employment Growth Estimates. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.   

subscribe to our market outlooks and sector insights

Disclosures

© 2025 Bridge Investment Group Holdings LLC. “Bridge Investment Group” and certain logos contained herein are trademarks owned by Bridge.

The information contained herein is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research, investment advice or an investment recommendation. Reliance upon the information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future performance or results.The information contained herein is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research, investment advice or an investment recommendation. Reliance upon the information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future performance or results.

This material has been prepared by the Research Department at Bridge Investment Group Holdings LLC (together with its affiliates, “Bridge”), which is responsible for providing market research and analytics internally to Bridge’s strategies. The Research Department does not issue any independent research, investment advice or investment recommendations to the general public. This material may have been discussed with or reviewed by persons outside of the Research Department.

This material does not constitute an offer to sell any securities or the solicitation of an offer to purchase any securities. This material discusses broad market, industry, or sector trends, or other general economic, market, social, legislative, or political conditions and has not been provided in a fiduciary capacity under ERISA.

Economic and market forecasts or estimated returns presented in this material reflect the Research Department’s judgement as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Although certain information has been obtained from third-party sources and is believed to be reliable, Bridge does not guarantee its accuracy, completeness, or fairness. Bridge has relied upon and assumed without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of all information available from third-party sources. Some of this information may not be freely available and may require a subscription or a payment. Any forecasts or return expectations are as of the date of material and are estimated and are based on market assumptions. These assumptions are subject to significant revision and may change materially as economic and market conditions change. Bridge has no obligation to provide updates or changes to these forecasts.

This material includes forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainty. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Any reference to indices, benchmarks, or other measure of relative market performance over a specified period of time are provided for context and for your information only.​

ATLWAA-20250916-4828241-15212404